Crossings of the Houston & Texas Central, the Missouri - Kansas - Texas, the St. Louis Southwestern, and the International & Great Northern railroads
![]() |
Left: John W. Barriger
III took this photo facing southwest from the rear platform of his
private railcar as his Missouri - Kansas - Texas ("Katy") train
proceeded north in the 1930's. Barriger's camera was prompted
by the sudden appearance of the building at left, Tower 21, as he was crossing
into East Waco over the Katy Railroad's Brazos River bridge (note truss
visible over the tracks in the distance.) To Barriger's right, tracks belonging to the St. Louis Southwestern ("Cotton Belt") Railroad continue southwest toward that company's Brazos River bridge into downtown. Both bridges are more than 500 ft. long, yet the river's presence is otherwise undetectable from this view. At lower right, tracks come in and connect to both the Katy and Cotton Belt lines. These tracks probably merge into a single industry spur off the image to the right. Southern Pacific (SP) tracks can be seen crossing adjacent to the tower on both sides. The near side is the SP line from Bremond arriving into Waco where it terminates; its original extension to Ross was abandoned in 1929. The far side tracks lead to the Cotton Belt bridge, a connection in place at least since 1915. SP acquired the Cotton Belt in 1932. |
Right: This photo of Tower 21 was taken by Barriger on a different trip in the 1930s. Here, his view from the rear platform is northeast as his southbound train moves onto the Katy's bridge over the Brazos. SP tracks leading to the Cotton Belt's Brazos River bridge are visible crossing in front of Tower 21. Like all interlocking tower buildings in Texas, Tower 21 displays its tower number on a small white rectangular placard, barely visible beneath the upper windows. |
![]() |
After a pause during the Civil War, the Houston & Texas Central (H&TC) Railway
resumed its northward construction toward the Red River,
passing through Hearne and Bremond into Groesbeck
by the end of 1870. Bremond became the target endpoint of the Waco Tap Railroad,
chartered by Waco interests to "tap" the H&TC main line to bring rail service to Waco, a thriving town of 3,000 inhabitants
and the county seat of McLennan County
about forty miles northwest of Bremond. The Waco Tap's construction was mostly
dormant due to financing issues, but conveniently, H&TC's investors had been looking at
the prospect of building a lengthy branch line into the Texas Panhandle. Waco
was the obvious gateway in that direction, hence, negotiations ensued to see
what might be done under the Tap's existing charter. To convey the investors' long term
intent, the Texas Legislature modified the charter on August 6, 1870 to
establish a new name, the Waco & Northwestern (W&NW) Railway. The branch line
from Bremond to Waco was completed for the W&NW by H&TC's construction forces in
September, 1872. The W&NW was purchased by the H&TC in 1873 and operated as a subsidiary.
Having completed its main line from Houston to the Red River that same year, the H&TC had begun exchanging freight and passengers with the
Missouri, Kansas & Texas (MK&T, "Katy") Railroad, which had bridged the
Red River into Denison about the same time. The
Katy's track network extended north and east through Indian Territory (Oklahoma)
to Kansas and Missouri, making Denison an important junction for exporting
Midwest grain through Houston and Galveston.
The Brazos River crosses diagonally through Waco on a southeast heading
toward the Gulf of Mexico. The Brazos' proclivity for flooding raised the cost of bridgeworks needed to span
it and impacted right-of-way (ROW) selection.
The H&TC main line out of Houston had remained
east of the Brazos, hence the W&NW's connection at Bremond was also east of the
river. Downtown Waco is west (and south) of the river, across from an
unincorporated community of neighborhoods on the east (and north) side that
became known as East Waco. The H&TC's goal for the W&NW was to build to the
Texas Panhandle; the Brazos would need to be crossed eventually. Rather
than do so at Waco to serve downtown directly, the W&NW remained east of the
river, passing through East Waco close to the riverbank.
![]() ![]() |
Left Top:
In late 1876, the H&TC began building an eleven-mile northward extension
of the W&NW to the community of Ross. On March 23, 1877, the
Galveston Daily News quoted a
Waco
Examiner report that the depot at Ross was under
construction. The article also carried a prediction by the Cleburne
Tribune that the W&NW extension would reach
Cleburne within four months. Ross was named in honor of Lawrence Sullivan "Sul" Ross, a famous Texas Ranger in his earlier life. Ross had also served as a Confederate General. He settled in McLennan County during the post-war Reconstruction period, but whether he lived in the vicinity of his namesake community is undetermined. Ross would go on to become Governor of Texas in 1887 and President of the Agricultural and Mechanical College of Texas (now Texas A&M University) in 1891. The H&TC had attracted the attention of Charles Morgan, owner of a major Gulf of Mexico steamship line. Morgan had begun acquiring railroads to move goods through the ports servicing his steamships. To this end, he organized Morgan's Louisiana and Texas Railroad and Steamship Company and then proceeded to buy the H&TC in early 1877, naming his son-in-law, Charles Whitney, as President. Morgan's death in 1878 disrupted planning for the northwest extension and precipitated a time-consuming settlement of his massive estate. The dissolution and restructuring of Morgan's business empire eventually led to the H&TC being acquired by Southern Pacific (SP) in 1883. Left Bottom: To avoid further delay, H&TC President Charles Whitney elected to build the extension under a new charter, the Texas Central (TC) Railroad, filed on May 30, 1879 as reported a few days later by the Fort Worth Daily Democrat of June 6. Soon, TC construction trains were using the W&NW through Ross to move rails and other materials north. In October or November, 1879, the TC founded the eponymous town of Whitney. The Handbook of Texas asserts November 25, 1879 as the date town lots were sold at Whitney, a date backed by various newspaper accounts. However, the Handbook also claims that Whitney "...was established in 1876 when the Houston and Texas Central Railroad built a line through Hill County to Cleburne." This is simply untrue; there was never a rail line between Whitney and Cleburne (the Cleburne Tribune's prediction was entirely wrong.) The Handbook compounds its error by claiming Whitney was "established" in 1876; it wasn't founded until the TC tracks reached the area in the fall of 1879. |
The TC was backed by new investors including Hetty
Green, the notorious "Witch of Wall Street." After construction of the northwest
extension was underway, the TC also began building a northeast extension
to Paris off the H&TC main line near Ennis. The
assumption behind both branches was that upon completion, they would be acquired
and merged by the H&TC.
Having started with only a rail line from
Houston to Groesbeck in 1870, the H&TC had become a major force in Texas
railroading by the end of the decade. Cooperation with the Katy at Denison took
a few years to develop fully, but their traffic agreement ultimately worked
well. Texas railroad historian S. G. Reed described it as "practically a
through line". By 1876, the Katy and the H&TC were jointly operating
Pullman cars between Houston and St. Louis. This progress did not go unnoticed
by railroad magnate Jay Gould who was plotting to advance his rail empire
into Texas. Gould controlled Midwest and eastern railroads, but he needed an
outlet to Mexico and ports on the Gulf to maximize profitability. Gould began
eyeing the Katy as a potentially important component of his plan to invade
Texas.
As the Katy and H&TC were nearing completion of their connection
at Denison, Gould became greatly
disturbed by the 1872 announcement of a merger of the International Railroad and
the Houtson & Great Northern Railway to form the International &
Great Northern (I&GN) Railroad. Through a connection to the Texas & Pacific
(T&P) Railway at Longview, it would soon be operating from the Midwest to Houston,
Galveston and Hearne, heading for the Mexico
border at Laredo. The I&GN would be a formidable competitor; much of it already
existed whereas Gould had no rails in Texas at all. Gould plotted a
lengthy effort to gain control of the I&GN beginning with a takeover of the Katy Railroad
as his initial rail presence in Texas. The Katy's stock was so diluted that it was virtually
impossible for Gould to buy a controlling interest, and there were no large
blocks of Katy stock available for private sale. Undeterred, Gould found
another way. Author Wayne Cline in his 2015 book The
Texas Railroad explains that Gould's subtle (and long term) plan to take over
the Katy began on October 22, 1873 when...
"...he stage-managed the election of a loyal ally, William Bond, as the road's second vice president. Bond proceeded to fire key Katy managers and replace them with Gould's henchmen. On December 21, 1874 Bond was appointed receiver of the MKT, and on March 1, 1876 he became the Katy's general manager. By December, 1879, Bond had brought so many Gould supporters aboard the MKT that Jay was elected president."
Though it took six years, Gould gained control of the Katy and began using the H&TC connection at Denison to send commodities sourced by his Midwest railroads to Houston and Galveston. With little stock ownership, Gould could best reap the benefits of the Katy's profitability by leasing it to a railroad he controlled, the Missouri Pacific (MP) Railroad, in which he had a large ownership position. This occurred in December, 1880 and Gould proceeded to execute a track expansion deep into Texas, focusing on Fort Worth as the first stop south of Denison. As a result of lease accounting and operating policies tilted heavily toward MP, its stockholders (particularly Gould) would enjoy the profits of the combined enterprise while Katy stockholders would see their company simply remain afloat -- not losing money but not profitable.
To meet tracks being laid south from Fort Worth, MP initiated construction
in 1881
out of East Waco. Construction materials could be shipped there on
the W&NW, particularly steel rails through the Port of Galveston.
MP's headquarters was not in Texas, thus it could
not comply with state law requiring railroads owning lines in Texas to
be headquartered in state. Gould finessed this problem by assigning the
title to MP's new construction to the Katy. But publicly and in the press, Gould's construction
was promoted as an MP activity; those were MP
depots being built in towns along the route. The Katy was a mostly invisible subordinate even though it
remained a
publicly traded company. Gould's construction south from Fort Worth
stopped at Alvarado,
and his northward construction arrived there in August, 1881, opening MP service between Fort Worth and East Waco. Right: To serve Waco proper and continue building south, MP had to bridge the Brazos into downtown. The first construction train to cross the river was reported by the Waco Daily Examiner of December 23, 1881. |
![]() |
![]() |
Even before MP had bridged the Brazos to continue its
southward march through Temple toward
Taylor and beyond, Gould had begun negotiations to buy the I&GN. He had successfully limited
its viability by
acquiring control of the two railroads that combined to provide the I&GN's only
direct connection to St. Louis from Longview: the T&P and the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern (SLIM&S)
Railway, which connected to the T&P at Texarkana. On June 1, 1881, it was announced that Gould had
acquired all of the I&GN common stock in a two-for-one swap for Katy stock.
Gould became President of the I&GN and leased it to the Katy for 99 years while
allowing the I&GN to continue using its own name (a recognized brand, the largest railroad in
Texas at the time.)
Simultaneous with MP's 1881 construction at East Waco,
the Texas & St. Louis (T&SL) Railway had begun building a narrow gauge rail line toward Waco
from Tyler via Corsicana.
The company was originally the Tyler Tap Railroad chartered in 1871 to bring rail
service to Tyler by "tapping" the T&P at Big Sandy in 1877. Two
years later, the name was changed to T&SL as a 107-mile segment was built from Big Sandy
to Texarkana, with
additional tracks into Arkansas. The T&SL claimed the moniker Cotton Belt
Route and the public embraced it; Cotton Belt
would be the nickname of an operational railroad for the next 110 years. In addition to Cotton Belt, the T&SL was
sometimes called the Narrow Gauge by various newspapers even though there were other narrow
gauge railroads in Texas.
The T&SL's westward expansion toward Waco
occurred in 1880-81, but like MP, the T&SL also elected to begin work at
East Waco before its consruction from Tyler reached town. This led to
a violent conflict with MP regarding rights-of-way and crossings.
The clash was so intense that a lengthy article in the
Galveston Daily News described it with phrases such as
"withdrawal of both forces to their camps", "expecting another
attack" and "Missouri-Pacific forces again charged the track". The
article also mentions a criminal proceeding on "...charges of destruction of
property and inciting a riot..."
![]() |
Left: The opening paragraph of this article from
the Galveston Daily News of April 26,
1881 conveys a bit of the intensity of the brawl between MP and T&SL
construction forces in the battle for right-of-way in East Waco. Right: Elsewhere in the same edition, the Galveston Daily News reported on "The Railroad War" and an injunction issued against the "St. Louis and Texas Road" [sic] by a Federal Judge in Dallas. Below: The Fort Worth Daily Democrat of April 30, 1881 mentions that the T&SL's chief engineer had come to East Waco, presumably to find an alternate ROW for the T&SL tracks. ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
When the conflict was settled, both railroads
completed their lines into East Waco from Ft. Worth and Tyler, respectively, in
August, 1881. MP was nearing completion of its Brazos River bridge; it would
open in December. The T&SL was planning to build west to Gatesville, so it
would also need to bridge the Brazos. Left: On April 22, 1882, the Cotton Belt bridge over the Brazos opened 100 yards west of MP's bridge. The tracks to Gatesville were completed later that year. (Waco Daily Examiner, April 23, 1882) |
In direct competition to MP, the T&SL had expanded
rapidly; Gould viewed it as a genuine threat to his business. By 1883, the T&SL was operating
from Bird's Point, Missouri on the Mississippi River to Waco and Gatesville. This expansion overextended the T&SL, largely because it lacked the
passing sidings and rolling stock necessary to run a lengthy, single-track
railroad efficiently. The
Depression of
1882-1885 hit railroads particularly hard, causing the T&SL to enter
receivership in 1884. Yet, this undoubtedly helped keep the railroad from falling into Gould's hands. In February, 1886, the
St. Louis, Arkansas & Texas (SLA&T) Railway was created by the bankruptcy judge to
become the new Cotton Belt, going against the advice of T&SL President
Sam Fordyce who believed residual operational issues would inhibit
profitability.
Despite Fordyce's concerns, the receivership ended and
within a year, the SLA&T had decided to build new branch lines into north Texas
from its main line to compete with Gould on traffic from Sherman and
Fort Worth. This culminated in a secret agreement
between Fordyce and Gould in 1888 for the Cotton Belt and MP to cooperate on
traffic through Texarkana. Gould began to gain financial leverage over the SLA&T
with loans and stock purchases, positioning him to guide its reorganization when
it became insolvent in 1889 (as Fordyce had predicted.) In 1891, the next bankruptcy plan created a new railroad dominated by Gould. It
was known as the
St. Louis Southwestern Railway (SLSW or SSW), but more commonly just Cotton Belt
which Gould had preferred for the railroad's formal name.
Gould installed his younger son Edwin as President of the SSW, and Edwin held
that title until his retirement in 1925. A series of ownership changes
in the late 1920s resulted in the Cotton Belt becoming a subsidiary of SP in 1932.
The success Gould had in taking over the Cotton
Belt helped to offset the major problems he was having with the Katy.
The Katy's stockholders were angry with the unfavorable terms of the
lease to MP. Gould had for several years successfully prevented the
stockholders from calling a meeting where they could fire him, but his delaying
tactics eventually ran out. In a special meeting held in May, 1888,
Gould was terminated by the Katy's stockholders for malfeasance
associated with the MP lease. The new Katy management immediately sought
bankruptcy protection. The State of Texas had sued the Katy a year
earlier for
non-compliance with various Texas railroad ownership and service laws,
and in 1890, the Texas Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's order in
which MP's lease of the Katy had been dissolved. The
Katy would continue to operate in Texas in receivership until it could be
reorganized pursuant to a new Texas charter to be enacted by the Legislature.
[The Katy didn't have a Texas charter; the Legislature had granted
permission for the Katy to build into Denison under its Kansas charter,
thus it was not headquartered in Texas as required by state law for
track ownership.]
Ironically, Gould remained President of the I&GN even though it was owned by the Katy. Gould had to resort to an unusual
gambit to prevent the Katy from firing him from the I&GN. Right: The Fort Worth Daily Gazette of February 21, 1889 printed the entire petition submitted to the Court by Katy management asking to intervene in a lawsuit Jay Gould had filed against the I&GN. Gould was President of the I&GN -- why would he file suit against his own railroad? It was the culmination of a clever ploy by Gould to force the I&GN into bankruptcy for non-repayment of a personal loan he had made to the I&GN, a loan that as President he had refused to repay. The money was not needed by the I&GN; the loan was made solely as a means of enabling Gould to force the I&GN into bankruptcy court, thereby preventing Katy management from firing him from the I&GN. Gould was on both sides of the bankruptcy case -- obvious corruption -- so the Katy requested an independent Receiver be appointed by the Court to run the I&GN. This would facilitate the Katy settling with the Receiver by repaying the funds directly to Gould, thereby terminating the I&GN's bankruptcy and enabling Katy management to fire him. Gould's ploy was simply to buy time to lobby the Texas Legislature to ensure that the Katy's new charter would not allow it to retain the I&GN. |
![]() |
The Legislature passed a new Katy charter law
on October 28, 1891 granting rights to a new railroad, the Missouri, Kansas &
Texas of Texas, to be headquartered in Denison as a subsidiary of the parent
Katy corporation based in Missouri. The subsidiary would own most of the Katy's
current Texas rail lines, but not the I&GN (nor the East Line & Red River
which ran between Jefferson and McKinney.) Gould's delaying tactics had
provided time for the Legislature to sour on the idea of allowing the Katy to
own the I&GN. The Katy's only viable option was to sell it back to Gould,
and he obtained a bargain price because the other major Texas railroads (besides
the T&P, of which Gould was still President) were precluded from bidding. They
competed directly with the I&GN and thus owning it
would violate a competition provision in the Texas Constitution. Unfortunately,
Gould had little time to focus on the future of the I&GN; he died in late 1892 and his rail empire
was taken over by his son George. The Katy
became independent and remained so for nearly a hundred years, experiencing
financial ups and downs like all railroads. Emerging from another bankruptcy in 1923, its name was changed to the
Missouri - Kansas - Texas Railroad, hence the acronym became "M-K-T"
(typically reduced to "MKT") instead of "MK&T". In 1989,
MP bought the Katy, a hundred years after MP's lease of the Katy had been
abrogated by Texas courts.
Like the T&SL, the Depression of 1882 also sent the H&TC into receivership resulting in SP losing control.
It also interfered with the H&TC's plan to acquire the TC upon completion of the
branch to Albany. As part of the financial reorganization, a
new Houston & Texas Central Railroad (not Railway, as originally named) was
chartered. This new H&TC was able to re-acquire the main line to
Denison from the bondholders in 1890, and the H&TC
was in turn reacquired by SP. Under SP ownership, the H&TC continued to operate
as a subsidiary until it was leased (1927) and then merged (1934) into SP's
Texas & New Orleans (T&NO) Railroad, the primary SP operating company for Texas
and Louisiana lines.
The bankruptcy court had separated the W&NW from
the H&TC, planning to sell it at auction on the courthouse steps in Waco. Two of the key players involved in the auction were C. P. Huntington, SP's
chairman, and Col. E. H. R. "Ned" Green, Hetty Green's son. In a 1968 master's thesis,
The Waco and Northwestern Railroad – A Thesis
submitted to the Faculty of Baylor University in partial fulfillment of the
requirements of the Degree of Master of Arts,
Judy Jolley
Rosenbaum explains what happened next
(hat tip, Bradley Linda):
December 28, 1892, Auction on the steps of the McLennan County courthouse –
bidding war between Julius Kruttschnitt - GM Southern Pacific Lines Texas &
Louisiana, L. Harrison of the Rock Island, L.P. Gold of a 3rd Party
and E.H.R. “Ned” Green, Hetty Green’s son – who won the railroad for $1.365
Million. However, the land notes were subject to a claim by the stockholders and
was not included in the sale. Following a lengthy court battle between C.P.
Huntington and Ned Green, Green’s bid was set aside and in March 1895, the US
District Court at Galveston ordered the railroad again to be sold at auction.
September 3,
1895 – Auction day – speculation had been rampant that the Burlington, MKT, and
SA&AP were all interested in buying the W&NW. At the auction, Charles Hamilton,
VP & GM of the Texas Central opened bidding at $1 Million. Bidding war ensued
between Hamilton, Judge R.S. Lovett of Houston, and when it hit $1.3 million,
Judge Wilbur Boyle of St. Louis jumped in, winning the road for $1.505 million.
Boyle was an agent of Huntington, and on July 1 1898, Boyle paid the remainder
of the price, and conveyed it to the H&TC
As the H&TC had entered receivership in 1885, the
closely related TC suffered the same fate. Its northwest extension to Albany had been completed in 1881, but
construction of the northeastern
branch out of Ennis was still in progress between
Kaufman and Greenville
when the receivership began. The northeastern branch was divested by the
bankruptcy court and sold to Hetty Green in 1892 in exchange for her disclaiming
any financial interest in the TC bonds she held as one of its founding
investors. The branch became the Texas Midland Railroad
to be run by her son Ned. Operating the new railroad may have been enough
for the Greens; despite winning (and then not winning) the first W&NW auction, they did not participate in the second.
In January, 1893, the
TC's reorganization resulted in the
remaining line from Ross to
Albany being deeded by the TC's bondholders to a new Texas Central Railroad Company,
completely independent of the H&TC. The financial restructuring of the TC
had caused it to miss the first W&NW auction, but on sound financial footing, the TC
opened the bidding at the second auction. It wanted direct
access to the other railroads at Waco rather than remaining limited to the W&NW
connection at Ross.
![]() |
Failing to win the auction, the TC instead built a 1.6 mile spur from Ross to the Katy main line three miles north of Elm Mott, as reported (left) on Sept. 24, 1897 by Railway Age. The H&TC had sued, but was unable to stop it. [This ROW is probably Ross Rd. today.] No longer getting much business at Ross, SP leased their Ross - Waco line to the TC, as reported (right) by Railway and Engineering Review, August 5, 1899. The TC built its own line from Ross to Waco in 1903. | ![]() |
The TC added
tracks from Albany to Stamford (1900), Stamford to Rotan (1907) and De Leon to
Cross Plains (1911.) In 1910, the Katy -- independent for two decades -- acquired 90% of the stock of
the TC. It did not, however, take control of the company until May 1, 1914
when the TC was leased to the Katy's Texas-based subsidiary.
In 1895, the Katy finally completed the line from Fort Worth to Houston
through Waco that
Gould had begun building south from Denison in 1881. This
provided yet another competitor in the valuable Fort Worth - Houston market besides SP
and Santa Fe. George Gould was President of both the
I&GN and the T&P, and his T&P was a major force in Fort Worth
railroading. Unfortunately, the T&P and I&GN could only offer a lengthy,
circuitous route between Fort Worth and Houston via Mineola,
Troup and Palestine, service much too slow to capture
a legitimate market share.
Gould began to contemplate a faster, more direct route between Fort
Worth and Houston that could create a competitive advantage. He would do this under the
auspices of the I&GN, with the southern endpoint at Spring, about 25 miles north of Houston on the main line to Palestine. To isolate construction finances, Gould chartered a separate
railroad, the Calvert, Waco and Brazos Valley (CW&BV), but it existed only
on paper and only briefly. The entire line was built in disjointed
sections
by multiple I&GN crews as reflected in the construction reports submitted
annually to the Railroad Commission of Texas (RCT):
1900:
Calvert to Valley Junction, 14.3 miles (CW&BV)
1901: Valley Junction to Bryan, 22.75 miles (CW&BV)
1901: Calvert Junction to Marlin, 28.65 miles
(CW&BV)
1902: Bryan to Spring, 78.22 miles (I&GN)
1902: Marlin to Waco, 41
miles (I&GN)
1903: Waco to Fort Worth, 94.55 miles (I&GN)
![]() |
In February, 1901, an act
of the Texas Legislature gave formal permission for the I&GN to acquire
and merge the CW&BV. The line had been built east / north of the Brazos
River, paralleling the H&TC (former W&NW) much of the way and crossing
it at Marlin. Because the original W&NW
survey had located the best route between Marlin and Waco, the I&GN
instead turned north at Marlin and went to the town of Mart before
turning west to reach Waco. At Waco, the I&GN built a spur into East
Waco for passenger service while the main line went north along the
eastern outskirts of town, connecting with the Katy and Cotton Belt. The
I&GN also crossed the Cotton Belt about two and a half miles northeast
of the Brazos River. The I&GN arrived at Fort Worth in 1903, but unfortunately for Gould, the line soon became notorious for accidents
attributed to poor signaling and
a poorly constructed roadbed. In 1902, RCT authorized construction of Tower 8 to control the I&GN's crossing of the Cotton Belt east of Waco. RCT had gained this authority under a 1901 state law directing it to manage the deployment of interlocker technology to improve crossing safety. This also improved operational efficiencies by limiting unnecessary stops at grade crossings of two railroads. RCT commissioned Tower 8 for operation on June 12, 1903 with a 20-function mechanical interlocking plant. Tower 8's function count was larger than would be required for a simple interlocked crossing (typically a dozen functions) indicating that there were connecting tracks at the junction from the outset. At the end of 1904, RCT's annual report reduced the Tower 8 function count to 16. It remained at this value until it rose to 34 in the report issued at the end of 1928. The report issued at the end of 1930 (the last comprehensive interlocker report ever issued by RCT) lowered the count back to 16, suggesting that perhaps the increase to 34 was simply a reporting error or perhaps a typesetting mistake. The I&GN was under constant orders from RCT to correct various issues and improve service on the Fort Worth line and elsewhere. When the U.S. went into a depression caused by the Panic of 1907, the I&GN was unable to make bond payments and it entered receivership in February, 1908. The receivership lasted three years under the appointed Receiver, Judge Thomas Freeman, a former T&P attorney. Freeman rehabilitated much of the I&GN's roadbed and signaling systems using $11 million in short term Receiver Certificates authorized for sale by the Court. In June, 1911, the Gould family bought the I&GN out of bankruptcy and named Judge Freeman to be the new President. Yet, revenues were insufficient to retire the short term notes issued during the receivership, hence the I&GN went back into bankruptcy in 1914. At that point, the Gould family connection to the I&GN ended forever. It was not until July 28, 1922 that the I&GN emerged from bankruptcy as a newly reorganized and independent company under the name International - Great Northern Railroad (hence both I&GN and I-GN are used as abbreviations.) Left: area overview; Towers 59, 144 and 191 were installed after 1903 |
Though MP had lost its Texas presence when the Katy
lease was cancelled, the Gould family remained in control until a financial
reorganization in 1917 after which MP's Gould era ended completely. In 1924, MP
tried to buy the newly independent I-GN as a means of reentering the Texas
market but the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) refused to approve the sale.
To keep the I-GN away from other competitors, MP helped the New Orleans, Texas &
Mexico (NOT&M) Railway buy the I-GN. That sale was approved by the ICC in June,
1924 and six months later, MP was allowed to buy the entire NOT&M on January 1,
1925. This gave MP the target I-GN plus the other assets of the NOT&M, which had
been operating several railroads along the Texas and Louisiana coasts under the marketing name
Gulf Coast Lines. The I-GN continued to operate under its own name
until 1956 when a lengthy MP receivership ended, resulting in the I-GN becoming
fully integrated into the reorganized MP.
The major junction of
all of the railroads near the riverbank in East Waco became the location of Tower 21, authorized by RCT to commence operation
on August 8, 1903. This was where the H&TC (W&NW) line along the east bank of
the Brazos crossed the Katy and Cotton Belt lines. The junction's complexity
explains Tower 21's opening as a 49-function / 44-lever electric interlocker
built by the Taylor Signal Co., the most complex interlocking in
Texas at
the time (eclipsed by the 59 functions of Tower 26
several weeks later.) In its annual report, RCT listed the Katy, the
Cotton Belt and the H&TC as the expense-sharing participants at
Tower 21.
![]() |
Left:
This index for the 1926 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map of Waco
has been annotated to highlight rail lines, interlocking towers and the
Brazos River. Besides
the railroads discussed above, there are two additions that appear on
the map. The San Antonio & Aransas Pass (SA&AP) had entered Waco from
the southeast in the late 1880s and ended downtown near the river. Tower 59
was established in November, 1904 where the SA&AP crossed the Katy,
about 700 ft. south of the Katy's Brazos River bridge. The Texas Electric (TE) was an electric interurban line from Dallas to Waco via
Hillsboro. It had an interchange track with
the Cotton Belt on
Price St. and it crossed the Brazos on its own bridge. The map also shows the H&TC (W&NW) tracks still intact to Ross.
Three years after the map was drawn, SP abandoned the line to Ross. It
had been of limited utility since 1903 when the TC built its own Ross -
Waco line.![]() Above: The MKT Employee Timetable of May 1, 1950 listed the locomotive whistle codes for various Katy and TC movements at Tower 21. |
In 1916, RCT's annual report began listing the railroad
that operated each tower. Tower 21 had the same architecture as many other Texas
towers built by SP (e.g. 16, 17,
81 and many others), so it was no surprise that SP
subsidiary H&TC had the responsibility for staffing Tower 21. In most cases, the
railroad that designed and built a tower would also take responsibility for staffing
it. The recurring operation and maintenance (O&M) expenses for staffing,
utilities and materials would be shared by
the railroads that used the interlocker, typically on a "weighted function
count" basis (the percentage of an interlocker's total function count
applicable to each railroad.) RCT's interlocker list dated
October 31, 1916 showed an increase in Tower 21's functions to a total of
59. By the end of 1930, Tower 21's function count had reached 67; it was a busy place.
Tower 8 was listed with the Cotton Belt as the railroad responsible for
operations. This is surprising; the crossing did not exist until 1902 or 1903,
placing it after the enactment of the 1901 state law granting powers to RCT to
authorize and approve interlockers. By rule for post-1901 crossings, the second
railroad to arrive (here, the
I&GN) was obligated to pay the entire capital cost of the tower, and in most such
cases, that railroad would lead the design and construction effort. As noted
above, leading the construction effort usually resulted in taking the responsibility for
O&M staffing. The railroad that led Tower 8's
design and construction is not confirmed, but an El
Paso Daily Times news item published February 24, 1903 mentions
installation of the Cotton Belt / I&GN interlocker at East Waco and asserts that the
I&GN's "...Superintendent of Buildings and Bridges is in charge of this work
at the junction..." The railroad in charge of the design can usually be
determined from architectural commonality with other towers, but unfortunately, no photo of Tower 8 has been found.
The railroads were free to negotiate their own arrangments, and for whatever
reasons, the Cotton Belt had accepted the staffing responsibility for Tower 8,
at least as of 1916. It might, however, have been different in earlier years.
For example, assuming the I&GN had the original staffing responsibility, its
receivership in 1908 could have motivated the Cotton Belt to take over the
responsibility if it had concerns about the I&GN's ability to staff the tower and cover the
up front cash flow for O&M expenses.
On May 29, 1928, RCT commissioned an interlocker, Tower
144, to control the crossing of the Katy and the Cotton Belt about a mile
northeast of Tower 21. The Katy referred to this location as Bellmead, an unincorporated community
(at the time) where the Katy had opened shops in the mid 1920s near a
long-standing Cotton Belt yard. The crossing was just south of the south end of
the Cotton Belt yard, and this proximity meant that Cotton Belt trains were always traveling at low speed as they
approached Tower 144 from either direction. In contrast, the Katy had a main
track that bypassed its yard, thus avoiding delays through the yard for
passenger trains. RCT's
list of active interlockers published at the end of 1928 shows the Tower 144
interlocker having only two functions, the smallest
number of functions ever commissioned by RCT for a numbered interlocker. RCT described the interlocking plant as "Mechanical" instead of
"M.-Cabin", which is how most of the others in that timeframe were listed, e.g.
Tower 143 at Devers,
Towers 145 and 149 at Edinburg, and several others. Cabin interlockers had
become common in the late 1920s as RCT required the
railroads to begin installing interlockers at the remaining uncontrolled
crossings that could not otherwise justify the expense of a manned tower. Automatic
interlocker technology had not yet been approved by RCT (see
Towers 141 and 142) so cabin interlockers (operated
by train crews) were the best option.
Tower 144's listing as "Mechanical"
with only two functions suggests that it was probably the first Ground Lever
interlocker approved by RCT (the only other was later, at
West Livingston.) Tower 144 wasn't really an
interlocker at all. It was simply a two-position lever located trackside that
controlled signals and derails instead of a track switch. The lever would
normally be positioned to permit unrestricted movements on the Katy tracks (the
busier of the two) until a Cotton Belt train needed to cross. All Cotton Belt
trains stopped at the crossing and a crewmember would exit the train to throw
the lever to the opposite position to warn any approaching Katy train to stop. A
crewmember would then return the lever to its normal position after the Cotton
Belt train had completed its passage over the diamond. Since the Cotton Belt
yard was a short distance north of Tower 144, its trains were moving at low
speed anyway, hence this procedure contributed a negligible delay to Cotton Belt operations.
Right: This track chart (courtesy of Ed Chambers)
drawn by the Katy Railroad Chief Engineer's Office in 1915 illustrates
why Tower 21 was commissioned with 44 active levers. The Katy, Cotton
Belt, TC, I&GN (passenger lead) and H&TC all converged in East Waco
just north of the river. Note that in addition to connecting to the
Cotton Belt bridge, the H&TC also connects to the Katy bridge at Tower
21. This map dates to seventeen years prior to SP's acquisition of the
Cotton Belt. The H&TC depot is shown on the line to Ross near Tower 21 while the Cotton Belt's "Union Station" and the Katy depot were both in downtown Waco south of the river. Since the I&GN used Union Station, its passenger lead merges onto the Cotton Belt tracks near Tower 21. Tower 144 was commissioned thirteen years after this chart was drawn, but the crossing it controlled had existed since the early 1880s. Five years after this map was drawn, the Katy built a major yard and shops at Bellmead. The "Cut-Off To T.C. M.L." at the top of the image is not the TC spur between Ross and Elm Mott. It was a shortcut between the TC main line and the Bellmead yard built after the Katy had acquired the TC. It remains intact to serve an industry adjacent to the former TC main line. |
![]() |
Above:
This note in the July 30, 1944 Cotton Belt Employee Timetable (ETT)
confirms that a "one lever interlocking device" was used to control the
Tower 144 crossing. Right: This excerpt from a September, 1956 Katy employee timetable (ETT) instructs train crews facing a STOP signal at Tower 144 with no apparent Cotton Belt train approaching the crossing to "...line lever on StLSW to set derails against StLSW, which will clear signal on M-K-T." |
![]() |
In 1965, SP
abandoned the former W&NW tracks between Marlin
and Bremond, and sold the remaining Marlin - Waco track segment to MP. Both railroads had tracks
from Marlin to Waco but SP's route was shorter with fewer curves
and lower grades. MP laid new tracks at Marlin to merge its line from
Valley
Junction into the SP tracks that it now owned. At East Waco, MP rerouted the
SP tracks onto the former I-GN line from Mart that led into MP's yard and
continued north to Fort Worth. From the reroute point, SP's tracks to Tower 21
were abandoned. A short segment of the I-GN line east toward Mart was retained
as a business spur,
but the rest of the line was abandoned through Mart all the way to Marlin.
As MP and SP were negotiating the
sale of SP's Marlin - Waco tracks, they were also looking at sharing SP's tracks
between
Bryan and
Navasota. SP's route between the towns was part of
the original H&TC line dating to the 1860s whereas the corresponding I-GN route
was longer and dated to 1902. MP was able to negotiate rights on SP's line and
proceeded to abandon 27 miles of I-GN tracks between Bryan and Navasota in 1965.
In addition to affecting the interlockings at those two towns, the
Tower 7 interlocking at College Station was no
longer needed.
The following year, MP began preparing to abandon its
former I-GN route between Waco and Fort Worth. To replace it, MP built a short
connecting track to the Katy at Bellmead to access trackage rights it had
negotiated on Katy's line to Fort Worth. The former I-GN route from Waco to the
outskirts of Fort Worth was abandoned in 1967-68. The end result of all of these
transactions was that MP's route southward from Fort Worth to Spring used Katy trackage rights to Waco, former
SP tracks to Marlin, I-GN tracks to Bryan, SP trackage rights
to Navasota, and the original I-GN route from there to Spring. This route
remains in use by Union Pacific (UP), successor to MP.
Above Left:
Over the years, Tower 8 became known as "Eastco Tower". The use of that
nomenclature with the rectangle icon on the above "Exhibit A" suggests that it remained a manned tower as
of 1957. It was converted to an automatic interlocker at least by September, 1961
when it is listed as such in a MP ETT. The fate of the tower structure is
undetermined. (Tom Kline collection)
Above Right: On
November 30, 1966, SSW issued this bulletin announcing that the automatic
interlocking at Tower 8 was being taken out of service. The new
Katy / MP (I-GN) connection had become operational allowing MP to exercise Katy
trackage rights between Fort Worth and Waco. Since the tracks remained intact, the
Tower 8 crossing was changed to a Stop sign, but notably, it was "NON-GATED".
Presumably, the lack of a gate reflected MP's intent to stop using the tracks,
but whether it had already obtained ICC permission to terminate service to the
stations on the route to Fort Worth is undetermined. ICC approval was apparently
forthcoming; the former I-GN was abandoned in 1967 (to
Maypearl) and 1968 (to Everman, a suburb of Fort Worth.) The Cotton Belt lasted
another twenty years,
abandoned between Corsicana and Waco (53 miles) in 1988. (Tom Kline collection)
Below Left:
This 1970 image ((c) historicaerials.com) illustrates how MP was able to abandon the I-GN tracks (yellow arrows) north of Waco by building a connection
(orange arrows)
to merge onto the Katy's line to Fort Worth (blue arrows); the switch is off the top of the
image at a location known as MP JCT. The Cotton Belt tracks
(pink arrows) cross the MP at two places: at Tower 8 (green circle) and at the new MP / Katy connector (blue
circle.) As expected, magnification shows that the I-GN tracks through Tower 8 had been
removed by the time this
image was captured. The MP (I-GN) / Cotton Belt connector (red arrow) remained intact.
Below Right: This ETT issued by MP in June, 1971 locates the
revised Cotton Belt crossing (blue circle) at MP's milepost 165.4 with symbols
indicating that it was at grade '(X)'
and controlled by an Automatic Interlocker '(A)'. "Via MKT" indicates
MP's use of 85 miles of Katy trackage rights between MP JCT and FW TOWER (Tower
53.) Further below, the
Cotton Belt ETT from 1985 shows "MP Crossing" (blue circle) at the Cotton Belt's
milepost 674.1 with letters 'AY'
signifying an Automatic interlocking within Yard limits. The Cotton Belt general order above lists Eastco (green circle) at milepost 673.75. The difference of 0.35 miles is the Cotton Belt
timetable distance between the two crossings (the actual distance is shorter,
about 0.22 miles.) This proximity, however, is irrelevant; they were never
operational simultaneously.
Above Left: In 1983, Lewis
Raby took this photo of northbound MP locomotive #3065 crossing the Cotton Belt
on the the MP / Katy connector. The view is northeast along the Cotton Belt
tracks in the direction of the dormant Tower 8 crossing about a quarter mile
from the camera. The white cabin housed the automatic interlocker, and
to its left, a white post is barely visible where a lock box is mounted to house the manual override controls for the
interlocker. (Tom Kline collection)
Above Right: This 1958 aerial image
((c) historicaerials.com) shows the Tower 8 crossing. The Cotton Belt tracks run
diagonally across the image with the I-GN tracks crossing in the middle on a
slightly more north / south heading. The tower is casting the shadow visible in
the southwest acute angle of the crossing. The source of the shadow visible east
of the I-GN tracks is undetermined. Traces of the connecting track illustrated
on the "Exhibit A" track chart above are visible on the northwest side of the
diamond.
UP acquired MP in 1982, several years before it purchased the Katy and merged it into MP's operations in 1989. The former Katy main line through Waco between Ft. Worth and Smithville remains an active route for UP. The fate of Tower 21 has not been determined, but it was likely removed from service c.1965 when the SP tracks to the tower were abandoned. A Katy employee timetable from September, 1965 shows an automatic interlocker controlling the crossings managed by Tower 21, and the tower building does not appear on 1970 aerial imagery.
Below: In 1988, the Cotton Belt tracks were abandoned
between Corsicana and East Waco. West of the Brazos, the Cotton Belt to
Gatesville had gradually been cut back to the vicinity of
McGregor, and in 1989, the tracks to McGregor were
abandoned from the west outskirts of Waco. SP continued to serve existing
customers located on its remaining trackage in Waco by sharing MP's Brazos River
bridge and the MP line from East Waco through Valley Junction to Hearne, where
SP had a yard. In 1996, UP acquired SP and fully merged it (along with MP) in
1997. The Cotton Belt bridge over the Brazos remains intact but was longer used
after the 1988-89 abandonments. The debate over whether to preserve it (and for what purpose) or dismantle
it continues. (Waco Tribune-Herald photos)
![]() ![]() |
These photos of Tower 21 (by Harry C. Blaize Jr., from the collection of John Linda) were taken from a train carrying model railroaders from the Katy's Waco depot to the Bellmead Shops in 1954. Far Left: the south side of Tower 21; Near Left: the north side of Tower 21 |
Above Left: This 1980 Lewis
Raby photo shows a northbound Katy train coming off the Brazos River bridge near the
former site of Tower 21. Note the
truss of the Cotton Belt bridge visible beyond the trees at right. (Tom
Kline collection) Above Right:
This Google Street View image from December, 2007 facing east on Mann St. shows
that parallel tracks of the W&NW (SP, left) and TC (Katy, right) to Ross
still had rails buried in the pavement despite abandonment by their owners in
1929 and 1967, respectively. In both cases, rails had remained in place in Waco
to support local businesses. Both sets of tracks appear to have been out of
service by 2007, and the rails had all been removed by the date of the next
Google Street View in December, 2012.
Above Left: Tom Kline captured
this image of the Tower 144 crossing site in 2007. Facing north along the Katy, the
Cotton Belt tracks still came in from the northeast but are out of service and
no longer cross. Tom has documentation showing that at least by 1957, Cotton Belt
trains were merging here onto the Katy main line and then rejoining the Cotton
Belt tracks to the bridge at Tower 21. The rails
west of Tower 144 became industry tracks.
Above Right: In this view to the south, concrete pads remained intact from earlier signal
posts. The Cotton Belt ROW went through the tree line to the right of the Katy
tracks. Below Left:
By March 2013, Google Street View shows that the Cotton Belt tracks had been
scrapped. Some sort of electronics box remained intact, and is visible in Tom's
photo above right. Below Right:
There's not much evidence of the former Tower 144 crossing, which now sits
beneath a US 77 Bus. overpass. Both Cottonbelt St. and Katy Lane
are nearby. (Google Earth)
As annotated onto the
Sanborn Map further above, there was one other
railroad through East Waco, an electric interurban line built originally by the
Southern Traction Co. that was completed into Waco in 1913. The Texas Electric (TE)
Railway was then chartered in 1916 to merge the Southern Traction Co. and the
Texas Traction Co., creating a network of three interurban routes out of Dallas
that ran to Waco, Corsicana and Sherman, respectively. The TE line from Dallas
to Waco went by way of Italy and
Hillsboro. At Waco, the
interurban had an interchange track with the Cotton Belt railroad on Price St. and then
continued south to cross the Brazos River into downtown on a 3-pier rail bridge
(above left, looking north,
date unknown, courtesy Baylor University Library.) The bridge was located about 350 yards
upstream of the Cotton Belt bridge. The TE terminated its operations at the end
of 1948 and the interurban bridge was re-decked to carry automobiles. The
opening of the Franklin Ave. bridge in 1973 motivated the decision to dismantle
the interurban bridge. This began in the summer of 1974 and was completed in
September, 1975, but the bridge's three piers were left undisturbed in the
river. The northernmost pier has been painted and repurposed (above
right) to hold a circular observation deck. (Google Street View,
November, 2021.)
Below: The
two piers that remain in the river along with the circular observation deck
built atop the northernmost pier sit adjacent to the
Waco Suspension Bridge. (Google Earth, October 30, 2019)
Thanks to Andy Nold, John
Linda and Johnny Myers for information about the interurban line into Waco.